Right now, the Christian world is abuzz with the release of a new book from the pastor of Mars Hill church in Grandville, Michigan, Rob Bell called, “Love Wins.” Even weeks before the book’s release, the promotional video promoting it has set off a flurry of parodies as well as responses to the premise of [...]
Right now, the Christian world is abuzz with the release of a new book from the pastor of Mars Hill church in Grandville, Michigan, Rob Bell called, “Love Wins.” Even weeks before the book’s release, the promotional video promoting it has set off a flurry of parodies as well as responses to the premise of the book.
Many are accusing him of universalism, or the belief that Christ died for everyone, therefore everyone will be saved. Rob Bell’s beliefs from “Love Wins” aren’t quite that simple though. He claims he’s not a universalist, although he does believe everyone will eventually end up with Christ in heaven (see the video at the end of this post).
How can he claim everyone will be saved without being a universalist? By saying that God’s love will “win” over sinners post-mortum. Hence the name for his book, “Love Wins.”
Rob Bell’s disdain for the gospel that teaches that everyone who rejects Christ’s kingdom will burn in hell forever comes through clearly in his video as he asks, “Gandhi’s in hell? He is? And someone knows this, for sure; and felt the need to let the rest of us know?”
But he’s just asking questions, right? Unfortunatley, these questions sound eerily close to the original message delivered to Eve in the garden by the serpent, “You will not surely die. For God knows that when you eat of it your eyes will be opened, and you will be like God, knowing good and evil.” (Genesis 3:4-5)
We can picture the scene now as a woeful sinner walks into Bell’s office at his church for counseling:
Sinner: Hi, Pastor Bell. I wanted to speak with you about this guilt that I have. I can’t seem to get rid of it.
Bell: What is it that’s bothering you?
Sinner: Well, I grew up in a Christian home, and have always been taught that Jesus paid the price for my sins, and that I need to turn to him and repent, or else I will burn in hell forever. I feel guilty because I can’t seem to live right. I continue to fall into sin, and feel like a worthless sinner.
Bell: Who said that you’re a sinner? Who says that you’ll burn in hell forever for your sins? In fact, didn’t you just say that Jesus paid the price for your sins?
Sinner: Well, doesn’t the Bible teach that I’ll burn in hell someday if I don’t accept Christ? Are you saying that I don’t have to make things right with God before I die?
Bell: Think about it. God only told you in the Bible you’d burn in hell because He knows that if you knew that everyone will end up in heaven anyway, that you wouldn’t go to church while you’re here on earth. Maybe you’ll burn a little while. But God’s love is great, and His love will convince you either in this life or the next. That stuff you heard growing up is just a bunch of tradition meant to scare people, and make others feel more powerful.
Sinner: I guess you’re right. I mean, sinning is a lot of fun. Well in that case, seeya later pastor!
Bell: Seeya next Sunday!
Sinner: Next Sunday? Why bother? I’ll see you in heaven!
Bell then continues on in his video to speak even more devilishly. He goes on to undermine even further the words of God, even the very character of God:
And then there is the question behind the questions, the real question: What is God like? Because millions and millions of people were taught that the primary message—the center of the Gospel of Jesus—is that God is going to send you to hell, unless you believe in Jesus. And so, what gets, subtlely, sort of caught and taught is that Jesus rescues you from God. But what kind of God is that; that we would need to be rescued from this God? How could that God ever be good; how could that God ever be trusted? And how could that ever be good news.
Again, Rob Bell has taken another page from Satan’s book. The serpent began his message to Eve by subtly undermining Eve’s understanding of God’s word, “Did God actually say, ‘You shall not eat of any tree in the garden’?” (Genesis 3:1)
Love Wins doesn’t present anything new. Rob Bell in his heresy, is doing nothing but his father’s work. The same work his father did in the beginning. He’s just the heretical flavor of the week. Like every other false teacher, he’ll be forgotten, but in the meantime, drag a whole bunch of people down with him.
Jesus’s words from John 8:39-47 aptly describe Rob Bell and his works. In this context, Jesus is telling a group of Jews including some Pharisees, that they are not Abraham’s descendants simply because they were born from Abraham’s physical lineage. In fact, he tells them that they have a different father altogether!
They answered him, “Abraham is our father.” Jesus said to them, “If you were Abraham’s children, you would be doing the works Abraham did, but now you seek to kill me, a man who has told you the truth that I heard from God. This is not what Abraham did. You are doing the works your father did.” They said to him, “We were not born of sexual immorality. We have one Father—even God.” Jesus said to them, “If God were your Father, you would love me, for I came from God and I am here. I came not of my own accord, but he sent me. Why do you not understand what I say? It is because you cannot bear to hear my word. You are of your father the devil, and your will is to do your father’s desires. He was a murderer from the beginning, and has nothing to do with the truth, because there is no truth in him. When he lies, he speaks out of his own character, for he is a liar and the father of lies. But because I tell the truth, you do not believe me. Which one of you convicts me of sin? If I tell the truth, why do you not believe me? Whoever is of God hears the words of God. The reason why you do not hear them is that you are not of God.”
As Rob Bell’s promo video spells out clearly, biblical Christianity is unpalatable to men who cannot bear to hear God’s words. So, Satan sends a liar to draw in thousands of followers for which to deceive. They cannot bear to hear God’s words either. So what you essentially have at Mars Hill Church, is a church full of people gathered together in the name of God, but unwilling to hear His words.
His Youtube video promoting the book is a tribute to the postmodern rejection of absolute truth characterized by the biblical God. The same absolute truth that has set the world on fire. The same truth that has caused sinners to repent of their sins, or writhe in misery under the weight of God’s word.
When you hear Rob Bell speak, who do you hear?
Church membership is a given these days. Every church does it. Politicians list it in their bios. People see themselves as associated with one particular “brand” or “church.” It’s sort of like saying that “I shop here…” or “I use this brand of ___.”
I’m not immune from this either. I have many times felt [...]
Church membership is a given these days. Every church does it. Politicians list it in their bios. People see themselves as associated with one particular “brand” or “church.” It’s sort of like saying that “I shop here…” or “I use this brand of ___.”
I’m not immune from this either. I have many times felt that great sense of pride when telling someone that I belong to this or that church. I can’t say that there’s anything wrong with any of this. Except maybe the pride part of course. By making these statements we’re defining to others part of our beliefs, either positively or negatively.
I do use the word sacrament in my title for a reason though… that for most churches:
- those desiring to be members are required to “do” something before they can become members (i.e. catechism classes, making some “special” confession or covenant before the church, etc.)
- and certain “benefits” are not given unless one becomes a member (i.e. shepherding from an elder, discipline, attending certain church functions, etc.)
According to the Merriam-Webster Dictionary, “sacrament” means:
1 a : a Christian rite (as baptism or the Eucharist) that is believed to have been ordained by Christ and that is held to be a means of divine grace or to be a sign or symbol of a spiritual reality b : a religious rite or observance comparable to a Christian sacrament
The word “sacrament” comes from the Latin sacramentum meaning “oath of allegiance, obligation.”
According to these definitions a sacrament is something:
- believed to have been instituted by Christ
- a means of divine grace
- a sign or symbol of a spiritual reality
- a religious rite or observance
- the making of an oath, and fulfilling of an obligation
I’d like to show what I believe to be a biblical disagreement with the way church membership is practiced by most of the church today.
I believe that church membership is practiced on a level equal to that of baptism and the Lord’s Supper, but lacks the authority that these other sacraments or ordinances have. I believe the first point of the definition above is where this practice most runs into problems.
Why is this important?
As I mentioned above, most people who attend church today identify themselves strongly with where they are members, thus identifying themselves with an allegiance/oath other than those instituted by Christ Himself. Again, I don’t think that church membership in certain forms is necessarily wrong, but the Bible speaks of baptism and the Lord’s Supper as those institutions that define the church and its duties.
This is important because no local church has the authority to ever put an obstacle before a Christian to come to Christ or to be identified with His church. I believe that church membership in most forms today is exactly that: a man-made sacrament.
Church Membership is seen as a means of Divine Grace
If you were to ask most church elders today what the difference is between a member and non-member, they would describe certain “benefits” or “standing” with the church which the member has over the non-member.
Since identification with the body, shepherding, and other aspects of the church are seen as means of grace, then it can only be said that by taking the oath of church membership is anyone ever entitled to benefits that that local body has to offer.
Church Membership seen as a Sign and Seal of a Spiritual Reality
Some churches would say that membership in their church represents some greater affiliation with the body of Christ that the non-member did not have before. There’s not too many, if anyone, who would say that church membership is a sign and seal, but yet without it, the church does not ACT in a way that recognizes the spiritual reality in a believing non-member.
In some cases, the non-member may not be able to participate in the Lord’s Supper and may eventually be asked to leave a church simply for not jumping through the man-made hoops established by that local church.
No church may say that membership is a sign and seal, but practically, membership is treated like one.
Church Membership Almost Always involves some Rite or Observance
It will be different in different churches and denominations, but church membership almost always involves some form of rite or observance. It could be classes, a particular confession made before the church, signing some agreement, whatever it may be, all of this counts as a tradition, rite, or observance.
Church Membership involves some Oath or Obligation
A lot of churches today put few obligations on their members, especially that of holiness. With so many churches apostosizing from the faith by allowing homosexual marriage and other immorality to go on inside its walls, those churches hold few obligations to being a member.
But there are still many churches that require some man-made obligation where they may take a biblical command such as, “Do not forsake the assembling of the brethren…” and then define in their own wooden way what that means.
Some churches require additional oaths before the congregation in addition to a confession of faith.
Why Church Membership at all?
Explicitly, most churches would not claim membership as a sacrament in their church, but for all practical purposes it is. The behavior and actions of the church surrounding it prove that the church believes church membership to be a sacrament. Again, I use the word sacrament instead of ordinance, because the way church membership is practiced more closely resembles a sacrament.
The #1 thing needed for a rite or observance to be a sacrament, is that it must be ordained by Christ. Where is this requirement to be admitted fully into a local congregation held out there by Christ or any of the apostles?
The only reasons for church membership are always pragmatic ones. It’s an attempt to fix certain human concerns like:
- “If we don’t have church membership, then people will not commit to being a part of the church.”
- “If we don’t have church membership, then we won’t know who to shepherd.”
- “If we don’t have church membership, then we won’t be able to hold our members accountable.”
- “If we don’t have church membership, then we won’t be able to run all of our programs and reach our city for Christ.”
These concerns are certainly valid.
Church Membership: an Unbiblical Sacrament
The fact of the matter is, most forms of church membership are anti-biblical because they are man-made works-based attempts to define who the people of God are. James 2:1-4 says,
1My brothers, show no partiality as you hold the faith in our Lord Jesus Christ, the Lord of glory. 2For if a man wearing a gold ring and fine clothing comes into your assembly, and a poor man in shabby clothing also comes in, 3and if you pay attention to the one who wears the fine clothing and say, “You sit here in a good place,” while you say to the poor man, “You stand over there,” or, “Sit down at my feet,” 4have you not then made distinctions among yourselves and become judges with evil thoughts?
This passage is speaking of treating the poor differently than the rich in the context of the church. But could we not say that the same applied to the Jews who thought that by virtue of birth and lineage that they were entitled to a piece of God’s kingdom? Could we not say the same about distinctions of race, sex, height, weight, etc.? What about man-made member/non-member distinctions?
The church membership question certainly fits the same criterion established by this passage. Church membership:
- creates distinctions
- these distinctions are man-made
- these distinctions do not involve a matter of holiness
- these distinctions involve showing partiality
In other words, most forms of church membership create unbiblical distinctions that divide the body of Christ in ways it is not meant to be divided.
In part two I’ll give an explanation of a form of “church membership” that is not works-based, while also addressing some practical concerns.
Here, I simply wanted to document how church membership resembles a sacrament, the unbiblical ways that the church treats it as a sacrament, and a short biblical refutation of church membership as it is practiced in most churches today.
Recent Comments


